ABSTRACT
As endoscopic skull base resections have advanced, appropriate reconstruction has
become paramount. The reconstructive options for the skull base include both avascular
and vascular grafts. We review these and provide an algorithm for endoscopic skull
base reconstruction. One hundred and sixty-six skull base dural defects, reconstructed
with an endonasal vascular flap, were examined. As an adjunct, avascular reconstruction
techniques are discussed to illustrate all options for endonasal skull base reconstruction.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak rates are also discussed. Small CSF leaks may be successfully
repaired with various avascular grafting techniques. Endoscopic endonasal approaches
(EEAs) to the skull base often have larger dural defects with high-flow CSF leaks.
Success rates for some EEA procedures utilizing avascular grafts approach 90%, yet
in high-flow leak situations, success rates are much lower (50 to 70%). Defect location
and complexity guides vascularized flap choice. When nasoseptal flaps are unavailable,
anterior/sellar defects are best managed with an endoscopically harvested pericranial
flap, whereas clival/posterior defects may be reconstructed with an inferior turbinate
or temporoparietal flap. An endonasal skull base reconstruction algorithm was constructed
and points to increased use of various vascularized reconstructions for more complex
skull base defects.
KEYWORDS
Skull base reconstruction - nasoseptal flap - AlloDerm - CSF leak rate - algorithm
- skull base - pericranial flap - vascular reconstruction
REFERENCES
1
Hegazy H M, Carrau R L, Snyderman C H, Kassam A, Zweig J.
Transnasal endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea: a meta-analysis.
Laryngoscope.
2000;
110(7)
1166-1172
2
Senior B A, Jafri K, Benninger M.
Safety and efficacy of endoscopic repair of CSF leaks and encephaloceles: a survey
of the members of the American Rhinologic Society.
Am J Rhinol.
2001;
15(1)
21-25
3
Kassam A, Thomas A J, Snyderman C et al..
Fully endoscopic expanded endonasal approach treating skull base lesions in pediatric
patients.
J Neurosurg.
2007;
106(2, Suppl)
75-86
4
Zanation A M, Snyderman C H, Carrau R L, Kassam A B, Gardner P A, Prevedello D M.
Minimally invasive endoscopic pericranial flap: a new method for endonasal skull base
reconstruction.
Laryngoscope.
2009;
119(1)
13-18
5
Fortes F S, Carrau R L, Snyderman C H et al..
Transpterygoid transposition of a temporoparietal fascia flap: a new method for skull
base reconstruction after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches.
Laryngoscope.
2007;
117(6)
970-976
6
Fortes F S, Carrau R L, Snyderman C H et al..
The posterior pedicle inferior turbinate flap: a new vascularized flap for skull base
reconstruction.
Laryngoscope.
2007;
117(8)
1329-1332
7
Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau R L et al..
A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular
pedicle nasoseptal flap.
Laryngoscope.
2006;
116(10)
1882-1886
8
Kassam A, Carrau R L, Snyderman C H, Gardner P, Mintz A.
Evolution of reconstructive techniques following endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches.
Neurosurg Focus.
2005;
19(1)
E8
9
Pinheiro-Neto C D, Prevedello D M, Carrau R L et al..
Improving the design of the pedicled nasoseptal flap for skull base reconstruction:
a radioanatomic study.
Laryngoscope.
2007;
117(9)
1560-1569
10
Germani R M, Vivero R, Herzallah I R, Casiano R R.
Endoscopic reconstruction of large anterior skull base defects using acellular dermal
allograft.
Am J Rhinol.
2007;
21(5)
615-618
11
Sautter N B, Batra P S, Citardi M J.
Endoscopic management of sphenoid sinus cerebrospinal fluid leaks.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol.
2008;
117(1)
32-39
12
Tabaee A, Anand V K, Brown S M, Lin J W, Schwartz T H.
Algorithm for reconstruction after endoscopic pituitary and skull base surgery.
Laryngoscope.
2007;
117(7)
1133-1137
13
Lorenz R R, Dean R L, Hurley D B, Chuang J, Citardi M J.
Endoscopic reconstruction of anterior and middle cranial fossa defects using acellular
dermal allograft.
Laryngoscope.
2003;
113(3)
496-501
14
Sonnenburg R E, White D, Ewend M G, Senior B.
Sellar reconstruction: is it necessary?.
Am J Rhinol.
2003;
17(6)
343-346
15
Ismail A S, Costantino P D, Sen C.
Transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic repair of CSF leakage using multilayer acellular
dermis.
Skull Base.
2007;
17(2)
125-132
16
Patel M R, Shah R N, Snyderman C H et al..
Pericranial flap for endoscopic anterior skull-base reconstruction: clinical outcomes
and radioanatomic analysis of preoperative planning.
Neurosurgery.
2010;
66(3)
506-512
discussion 512
17
Oliver C L, Hackman T G, Carrau R L et al..
Palatal flap modifications allow pedicled reconstruction of the skull base.
Laryngoscope.
2008;
118(12)
2102-2106
18
Chang D W, Satterfield W C, Son D et al..
Use of vascularized periosteum or bone to improve healing of segmental allografts
after tumor resection: an ovine rib model.
Plast Reconstr Surg.
2009;
123(1)
71-78
19
Kang M D, Escott E, Thomas A J et al..
The MR imaging appearance of the vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.
2009;
30(4)
781-786
20
Seiler R W, Mariani L.
Sellar reconstruction with resorbable vicryl patches, gelatin foam, and fibrin glue
in transsphenoidal surgery: a 10-year experience with 376 patients.
J Neurosurg.
2000;
93(5)
762-765
Adam M ZanationM.D.
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School
of Medicine
CB 7070, 170 Manning Drive, Ground Floor POB, Chapel Hill, NC 27599
Email: adam_zanation@med.unc.edu